Skip to content

Independent evidence reviews · Free · No referral fees

SaunaRespiratory

Sauna for recurrent upper respiratory tract infections and pneumonia risk

Evidence review

Grade C· Emerging6 studiesLast reviewed November 8, 2026Also reviewed: cold therapy (grade C)

Overview

A 1990 controlled trial reported about half as many common colds in the later months among volunteers taking regular saunas, with no difference in cold duration or severity, and a 1992 German study of 20 nursery-school children reported fewer respiratory infections and illness days over one year in those taking regular saunas. In the Finnish KIHD cohort, men who used the sauna 2 or more times per week had a lower rate of hospital-diagnosed pneumonia over about 25 years; in a later analysis the lowest risk was seen in men with both high fitness and frequent sauna use. Inhaling hot sauna air during an established cold did not reduce overall symptom severity in a randomized trial of 157 patients. The evidence concerns prevention in healthy adults and children rather than treatment in people with documented recurrent infections.

Key findings

  • Significantly fewer common colds with regular sauna over 6 months, roughly halved in the last 3 months; no change in duration or severity (Ernst 1990, n=50)
  • Fewer acute respiratory infections and days of illness over one year with regular sauna vs none; salivary IgA rose after sauna from 6 months (Conradi 1992, n=20 children, no figures in abstract)
  • Hot sauna-air inhalation during an acute cold: symptom AUC difference -3.9 (95% CI -9.7 to 1.9), P=0.19 (Pach 2010, n=157)
  • Pneumonia HR 0.69 (0.55-0.86) for 2-3 and 0.56 (0.35-0.88) for >=4 vs <=1 session/week (Kunutsor 2017, n=2,210)
  • Pneumonia HR 0.81 (0.68-0.97) for 2-7 vs <=1 session/week; 0.62 (0.48-0.80) with high fitness plus frequent sauna (Kunutsor 2021, n=2,275, same cohort)

Every study we reviewed

5 found benefit · 1 found no effect

Each study was checked on PubMed. The colored edge shows the direction of the result. The research library lists 18 studies on respiratory infections, across all heat and cold therapies, including case reports and older work not graded here.

[1]Pilot / uncontrolled studyn = 50Benefit

Regular sauna bathing and the incidence of common colds.

Ernst E et al. Ann Med. 1990. PubMed 2248758 · DOI

Who
healthy volunteers
What
regular sauna bathing vs abstaining from sauna or comparable procedures
Protocol
26 wk
Measured
frequency, duration and severity of common colds
Result
Significantly fewer episodes of common cold in the sauna group, particularly in the last 3 months when incidence was roughly halved; mean duration and severity did not differ.
Limitations
small; allocation method not described in abstract; healthy volunteers rather than patients with recurrent infections; unblinded
[2]Randomized controlled trialn = 157No effect

Visiting a sauna: does inhaling hot dry air reduce common cold symptoms? A randomised controlled trial.

Pach D et al. Med J Aust. 2010. PubMed 21143077 · DOI · Free full text

Who
adults with a newly acquired common cold
What
inhaling hot dry sauna air vs room-temperature dry air, both inside a hot sauna wearing a winter coat
Protocol
daily/wk · 3 days
Measured
symptom severity AUC over 7 days
Result
AUC 31.2 vs 35.1, difference -3.9 (95% CI -9.7 to 1.9), P=0.19; secondary differences in day-1 medication use (P=0.01) and day-2 symptoms (P=0.04).
Limitations
tests treatment of an acute cold, not prevention; single blind
[3]Prospective cohortn = 2,210Benefit

Frequent sauna bathing may reduce the risk of pneumonia in middle-aged Caucasian men: The KIHD prospective cohort study.

Kunutsor SK et al. Respir Med. 2017. PubMed 29229091 · DOI · Free full text

Who
Finnish men aged 42-61 (KIHD)
What
self-reported sauna frequency, 2-3 or >=4 vs <=1 session/week
Protocol
<=1 vs 2-3 vs >=4/wk
Measured
hospital-diagnosed pneumonia
Result
Multivariable HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.55-0.86) and 0.56 (0.35-0.88); after further adjustment 0.72 (0.57-0.90) and 0.63 (0.39-1.00). 375 cases over median 25.6 years.
Limitations
observational; men only; residual confounding possible
[4]Prospective cohortn = 2,264Benefit

Attenuated Risk of Pneumonia Due to Inflammation by Frequent Sauna Baths: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

Kunutsor SK et al. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022. PubMed 33797457 · DOI · Free full text

Who
Finnish men aged 42-61 (KIHD)
What
high (2-7) vs low (<=1) sauna sessions/week, with hsCRP
Protocol
<=1 vs 2-7/wk
Measured
incident pneumonia
Result
High vs low sauna frequency HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.95); high hsCRP with low sauna frequency HR 1.67 (1.21-2.29) vs normal hsCRP and low frequency. 528 cases over median 26.6 years.
Limitations
same cohort as Kunutsor 2017; observational; men only
[5]Prospective cohortn = 2,275Benefit

High fitness levels, frequent sauna bathing and risk of pneumonia in a cohort study: Are there potential implications for COVID-19?

Kunutsor SK et al. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021. PubMed 33426640 · DOI · Free full text

Who
Finnish men aged 42-61 (KIHD)
What
self-reported sauna frequency, high (2-7) vs low (<=1) sessions/week, jointly with measured cardiorespiratory fitness
Protocol
<=1 vs 2-7/wk
Measured
incident pneumonia
Result
High vs low sauna frequency HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.97); vs low fitness and low sauna, low fitness with high sauna HR 0.89 (0.71-1.13) and high fitness with high sauna HR 0.62 (0.48-0.80). 529 cases over median 26.6 years.
Limitations
same cohort as Kunutsor 2017 and 2022; observational; men only; COVID-19 not studied
[6]Controlled trial (not randomized)n = 20Benefit

Frequency of acute respiratory illness and salivary secretory immunoglobulin A under the influence of regular sauna bathing in children

Conradi E et al. Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin. 1992. Not in PubMed: source · DOIGerman publication; title and summary translated by SaunaLMN. Original title: Häufigkeit akuter respiratorischer Erkrankungen und sekretorisches Immunglobulin A im Speichel unter dem Einfluß regelmäßigen Saunabadens von Kindern

Who
Nursery-school children (11 taking regular saunas, 9 controls) (Germany)
What
Regular sauna bathing over one year (session details not given in the abstract) vs no sauna
Protocol
52 wk
Measured
Number of acute respiratory infections and days of illness; salivary secretory IgA before and after sauna (6 times)
Result
The sauna group had significantly fewer infections and fewer days of illness than controls (figures not given in the abstract); after 6 months, each sauna session was followed by a significant rise in salivary IgA.
Limitations
20 healthy children; allocation method not stated; no figures in the abstract; prevention in healthy children, not treatment of recurrent infections.

Protocols used in the studies

The prevention trials used regular sauna bathing for 6 months in adults or 1 year in nursery-school children (details not in abstracts). Cohort exposures were 2-3 or 4-7 traditional sauna sessions per week. The acute-cold trial used 3 days of sauna exposure.

What is still unknown

Randomized trials in people with recurrent respiratory infections; mechanism; generalizability to women and non-Finnish populations.

Safety

Cautions for sauna in this condition

  • Sauna is not a treatment for acute febrile illness; heat exposure during fever adds thermal load.
  • Legionella pneumonia linked to a sauna has been reported (case reports, PMID 16171106); this concerns water systems in communal facilities.
  • See general-safety.
General sauna safety and contraindications

For clinicians

Suggested rationale

A controlled trial (Ernst 1990) found fewer common colds with regular sauna bathing, and in a 25-year Finnish cohort (Kunutsor 2017; Kunutsor 2021) 2 or more sauna sessions per week was associated with lower pneumonia risk; evidence in patients with documented recurrent infections is lacking.

Suggested wording only. The treating clinician decides whether it reflects their clinical judgment for this patient.

Typical ICD-10 codes: J06.9, J18.9, Z87.01. Examples only; the clinician assigns the code.

What a letter of medical necessity should containWho can write it: physicians, NPs, PAs and others