Skip to content

Independent evidence reviews · Free · No referral fees

Cold therapyJoints & musculoskeletal

Cold therapy for osteoarthritis (including spinal osteoarthritis)

Evidence review

Grade C· Emerging6 studiesLast reviewed November 8, 2026Also reviewed: sauna (grade C)

Overview

Cold-therapy studies in osteoarthritis have used whole-body cryotherapy (WBC), a few minutes of cold air at about -166 F in a chamber, which is a different method from a home cold plunge. Uncontrolled and non-randomized studies, mostly in spinal osteoarthritis and combined with exercise, report reductions in pain and analgesic use. One randomized study in older women with lumbar spondyloarthrosis found reduced red-cell elasticity after WBC with exercise, which its authors considered a possible perfusion concern. No randomized trial with clinical outcomes and no cold-water immersion study was found.

Key findings

  • Uncontrolled survey, n=50 (spinal, knee and hip OA): 78% reported significant improvement after a 10-day WBC cycle, 4% none (Chruściak 2016).
  • Non-randomized controlled trial, n=48 degenerative lumbar spine: pain fell 1.5 points with WBC plus exercise vs 0.6 with exercise alone (Szpruch 2018).
  • Uncontrolled, n=30 lumbar spine OA: low back pain VAS fell (p<0.0001) after WBC with exercise (Barłowska-Trybulec 2022).
  • Randomized, n=94 older women with spondyloarthrosis: WBC plus exercise lowered erythrocyte elasticity; authors call WBC's benefit debatable (Kulis 2017).
  • No cold-water immersion or cold plunge study in OA identified.

Every study we reviewed

4 found benefit · 2 mixed results

Each study was checked on PubMed. The colored edge shows the direction of the result. The research library lists 17 studies on osteoarthritis, across all heat and cold therapies, including case reports and older work not graded here.

[1]Case series / reportn = 50Benefit

Subjective evaluation of the effectiveness of whole-body cryotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis.

Chruściak T et al. Reumatologia. 2016. PubMed 28115779 · DOI · Free full text

Who
Patients with osteoarthritis: 31 spinal, 10 knee, 9 hip (Poland)
What
WHOLE-BODY CRYOTHERAPY chamber, 10-day cycle
Measured
Patient-rated improvement, pain frequency and intensity (modified Laitinen), analgesic use
Result
Patients rated significant improvement in 39 (78%), improvement in 9 (18%) and no improvement in 2 (4%); authors report less pain and analgesic use
Limitations
Uncontrolled questionnaire study; subjective outcomes; WBC, not cold-water immersion
[2]Controlled trial (not randomized)n = 48Benefit

[The role of whole-body cryotheraphy in the treatment of people with degenerative spine disease].

Szpruch R et al. Wiad Lek. 2018. PubMed 30684327

Who
Patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease (Poland)
What
WHOLE-BODY CRYOTHERAPY, 10 sessions each followed by 30 min kinesiotherapy (n=24) vs kinesiotherapy alone (n=24)
Measured
Pain (numeric scale, Laitinen), lumbar mobility (Schober)
Result
Numeric pain score fell 1.5 points with WBC vs 0.6 with kinesiotherapy alone; Laitinen score fell 1.0 vs 0.5; lumbar flexion improved 0.8 vs 0.5 cm; between-group statistics not reported in abstract
Limitations
Not randomized; no between-group p values in abstract; Polish-language; WBC, not cold-water immersion
[3]Pilot / uncontrolled studyn = 30Benefit

Effect of whole body cryotherapy on low back pain and release of endorphins and stress hormones in patients with lumbar spine osteoarthritis.

Barłowska-Trybulec M et al. Reumatologia. 2022. PubMed 36186838 · DOI · Free full text

Who
Patients with lumbar spine osteoarthritis and low back pain (Poland)
What
WHOLE-BODY CRYOTHERAPY series combined with therapeutic exercise
Measured
Low back pain VAS, beta-endorphin, cortisol, adrenaline
Result
Low back pain VAS fell (p<0.0001); cortisol rose (p=0.0009); beta-endorphin (p=0.10) and adrenaline (p=0.08) changes not significant
Limitations
Uncontrolled; combined with exercise; WBC, not cold-water immersion
[4]Controlled trial (not randomized)n = 94Mixed

Effect of whole-body cryotherapy on the rheological parameters of blood in older women with spondyloarthrosis.

Kulis A et al. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017. PubMed 28482621 · DOI

Who
Women aged 65-70 with lumbar spondyloarthrosis (Poland)
What
WHOLE-BODY CRYOTHERAPY alone (n=22), kinesiotherapy alone (n=23) or both (n=24), randomly assigned, vs untreated controls (n=25)
Protocol
2 wk
Measured
Blood rheology: plasma viscosity, erythrocyte elongation and aggregation, fibrinogen
Result
Only the WBC plus kinesiotherapy group showed significant decreases in erythrocyte elongation (elasticity) and aggregation indices; authors call the benefit of WBC in these patients debatable because reduced erythrocyte elasticity may impair perfusion
Limitations
Laboratory outcomes only; untreated control not randomized; WBC, not cold-water immersion
[5]Controlled trial (not randomized)n = 134Benefit

Impact of regular cold exposure on electrical skin resistance in patients with joint degenerative diseases.

Machnia M et al. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2024. PubMed 37861346 · DOI · Free full text

Who
Patients with degenerative joint disease described as chronic inflammatory disease patients (France/Poland)
What
WHOLE-BODY CRYOTHERAPY chamber, 3 min at -166 F (-110 C), before daily exercise vs exercise alone
Protocol
-166 °F · 3 min · daily/wk
Measured
Electrical skin resistance (sympathetic activity) and severe mental-stress classification
Result
Number of patients classified with severe mental stress fell, and skin resistance rose, only in the WBC group; larger rise in men and patients under 60
Limitations
Surrogate autonomic outcome; allocation not described; diagnoses not specified in abstract; WBC, not cold-water immersion
[6]Controlled trial (not randomized)n = 89Mixed

Cryotherapy decreases histamine levels in the blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Wojtecka-Lukasik E et al. Inflamm Res. 2010. PubMed 20020313 · DOI

Who
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (44) and osteoarthritis (45) (Poland)
What
WHOLE-BODY CRYOTHERAPY chamber (20 RA, 17 OA) vs conventional physiotherapy (24 RA, 28 OA)
Protocol
-220 to -256 °F · 2-3 min · daily/wk · 4 wk
Measured
Blood histamine, neutrophil activation and cartilage-metabolism markers at 3 months
Result
WBC reduced blood histamine in RA (p<0.001), lasting at least 3 months; histamine unchanged in OA; other markers changed non-significantly; no changes with physiotherapy
Limitations
Laboratory outcomes only; no clinical outcomes in abstract; allocation not described; WBC, not cold-water immersion

Protocols used in the studies

Whole-body cryotherapy chambers at -166 F (-110 C) or -220 to -256 F (-140 to -160 C), 2-3 minutes once daily, 10 sessions over about 2 weeks (one study 4 weeks), usually followed by exercise or kinesiotherapy. No cold-water immersion protocol has been tested in osteoarthritis.

What is still unknown

No RCT with clinical outcomes; whether WBC adds to exercise in knee or hip OA; whether cold-water immersion has any effect; durability; vascular safety in older patients.

Safety

Cautions for cold therapy in this condition

  • Reduced erythrocyte elasticity after WBC with exercise in women aged 65-70 raised a possible perfusion concern (PMID 28482621).
  • Osteoarthritis patients are often older with cardiovascular comorbidity; cold exposure acutely raises blood pressure (Radtke 2016, PMID 26152773).
  • Whole-body cryotherapy contraindications and adverse events (16 documented across case reports and RCTs) are specific to cold-air chambers and do not transfer directly to cold-water immersion (Legrand 2023, PMID 37770960). See general cold safety entry.
General cold-water safety and contraindications

For clinicians

Suggested rationale

Small, mostly uncontrolled studies report less pain after whole-body cryotherapy combined with exercise in spinal and peripheral osteoarthritis (Chruściak 2016; Szpruch 2018); the evidence is preliminary, concerns a cold-air chamber, and does not establish benefit for cold-water immersion.

Suggested wording only. The treating clinician decides whether it reflects their clinical judgment for this patient.

Typical ICD-10 codes: M17.9, M16.9, M47.816, M19.90. Examples only; the clinician assigns the code.

What a letter of medical necessity should containWho can write it: physicians, NPs, PAs and others